JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 17, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Humberto Nupan

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Promiscuo De Familia De Mocoa (Putumayo) Y El Juzgado Noveno Civil Del Circuito De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Promiscuo De Familia De Mocoa, En Atención A La Competencia A Prevencion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Cajanal empresa Industrial y Comercial del Estado, descentralizada por servicios del orden nacional
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional para evitar la dilación de términos, aún cuando exista superior jerárquico común
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado Promiscuo de Familia de Mocoa (Putumayo), en atención a la competencia a prevención fijada por el demandante, para que tramite y decida de forma inmediata la tutela promovida por Humberto Nupan contra la Subdirección General de Prestaciones Económicas de la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.